HR Department
  • Home
  • Did you Know?
  • Our Services
    • NEW: Mediation
    • HR Audit
    • Implementation
    • HR Support Service
    • HR Services
  • Our Experts
  • Testimonials
  • The HR Advisor
  • Contact Us
  • Login

Protecting Your Business: A Case for Restrictive Covenants in Employment Contracts

17/6/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
According to all the confidence reports being released lately, things are getting better at social and business levels. Businesses are growing, unemployment levels are dropping and everyone appears to be that bit happier.

With all this recovery and the growing competition between businesses for skilled labour, it is inevitable that some of your staff are going to be tempted by, and may even move to, one of your competitors. If this happens and you haven’t protected your property – be it client lists, intellectual property or unique business processes – you may end up losing a lot more than just a staff member to the competition.

So what can you do to protest your business?

Whilst there are some implied obligations on employees in relation to their employers confidential information and trade secrets, restrictive covenants are becoming more and more common in employment contracts for senior employees, employees who have access to customers on a regular basis and employees with specialist knowledge of a business and its products or services.   Typically, the use of such agreements is found in companies that could experience financial loss if employees became employed by competitors, taking with them client lists, trade secrets valuable knowledge or other co-workers.

So what are restrictive covenants and how enforceable are they?

There are three main types of restrictive covenants:

1. A non-compete clause would prevent you from working for a competitor for a defined period after the termination of your employment;

2. A non-solicitation clause that doesn’t prevent you from working for a competitor, but it does prevent you from soliciting customers of your former employer; and

3. A non-poaching covenant prevents you from poaching your former colleagues.


1. Non-Compete Clauses?

In general the courts have been reluctant to enforce these types of clauses as they are seen to be a restriction on a person’s ability to work and anti-competitive.  Also, where a particular clause is seen as too broad or have unrealistic duration or geographically too wide they will be difficult to enforce as they will be seen as merely preventing employees from seeking employment elsewhere.

However, there are circumstances where certain restrictions will be allowed namely:-

A. Where an employer has a legitimate interest to protect- the restriction should not be a broad and general restriction on certain conduct; rather, an employer should specifically define the interest that may be damaged by the employee within the terms of the restriction itself;

B. Where the restriction is reasonable in terms of the activity that is being restricted- the restriction should only relate to the activity that the employee was engaged in whilst working for the employer;

C. Where the restriction is only for a reasonable time period-case law suggests that in general 6 months is reasonable;

D. Where the geographical extent of the restriction is reasonable- the extent of any geographical restriction will depend on the nature and location of the employers business for example a beauty salon that draws the bulk of its clients from the local area may require a relatively small geographic restriction e.g. 4 miles from the practice location. 

2. Non-Solicitation Clauses?

In general non-solicitation clauses are more enforceable than non-compete clauses as they do not directly prevent an employee from seeking alternative employment.  The same test of reasonableness in relation to the time period and geographic area also apply to these types of restrictions.  When these clauses are being drafted the restriction should be as specific as possible as to what is allowed and what is restricted, e.g. is the ex-employee only restricted in approaching clients of the employer or is it intended to cover where customers contact the ex-employee directly.

3. Non-Poaching of Staff Clauses?

Again as with the other restrictive covenants the enforceability of these clauses will greatly depend on how key the individual being restricted is to the business. It should be remembered that these clauses are not intended to be enforceable against the person being enticed to leave the company but against the person ding the enticing.  The employer should identify the key personnel in the organisation who may need other employees to assist them if they leave the business and go to a competitor or set up business on their own and consider putting a restriction in their contract to this effect.

4. What about enforcing the clause?

Employers are often reluctant to incur the cost or risk negative publicity in bringing an action against an ex-employee under a restrictive covenant.  However, where such a restriction exists and a breach by the ex-employee is causing or could potentially cause the employer to incur significant loss of businesses serious consideration should be given to enforcement. 

Furthermore such clauses do have an impact on employees who are considering leaving the company as they may be reluctant to test whether the company will bring an enforcement action, particularly where there is a clear requirement in their employment contract.

In conclusion where an employer feels that they have a legitimate interest to protect and that there are certain key employees who require some type of restriction then one or all of these clauses should be introduced into the contractual relationship.

The contents of this article are necessarily expressed in broad terms and limited to general information rather than detailed analyses or legal advice. Specialist professional advice should always be obtained to address legal and other issues arising in specific contexts.


0 Comments

    Archives

    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014

    Categories

    All
    Absenteeism
    Agile Management
    Anger
    Annual Leave
    Appointments
    Big Data
    Bullying
    Bullying In The Workplace
    Business
    BYOD
    Collaboration
    Communication
    Company Culture
    Compulsory Retirement
    Conflict Resolution
    Corporate Culture
    Covid 19
    Covid-19
    Cyber Bullying
    Data Protection
    Device Policy
    Digital
    Digital Transformation
    Disciplinary Procedures
    Discrimination
    Diversity
    Dress Code
    Emotional Intelligence
    Employee Benefits
    Employee Diversity
    Employee Engagement
    Employee Performance
    Employee Relations
    Employee Resignation
    Employee Retention
    Employee Rights
    Employee Wellbeing
    Employer Branding
    Employment Contract
    Equality
    Flexible Working Hours
    Freelance
    Freelancer Management
    Freelancing
    Gender
    Gig Economy
    Health And Safety
    Hiring Process
    HR
    HR Automation
    HRLocker
    HR Paper Work
    HR Performance
    HR Tips
    Human Resources
    Incentives
    Inclusion
    Independent Contractor
    In-house
    Innovation
    Intelectual Property
    Intern
    Jargon
    Just Culture
    L&D
    Leadership
    Learning & Development
    Long Term Illness
    Management
    Managers
    McDonalds
    Mediation
    Mentorship
    Millenials
    Motivating Staff
    Music
    Negative Employees
    Office Romance
    Onboarding
    Outsourced HR
    Paid Paternity Benefit
    Parental Leave
    Parenting
    Part Time
    Part-time
    Passive-aggressive
    Paternity Leave
    Paternity Leave Policy
    Pay Gap
    Pensions
    People Operations
    Poaching Employees
    Policy
    Problem Employee
    Productivity
    Profit
    Protected Disclosures Act
    Recruitment
    Redundancy
    Retirement
    Role Of HR
    Salary Transparency
    Sexual Harrassment
    Sick Leave
    Sick Pay
    Sick Policy
    Skills
    Skills Shortage
    Social Media
    Social Media Policy
    Staff Burnout
    Staff Engagement
    Staff Retention
    Staff Training
    Strategy
    Success
    Talent
    Talent Acquisition
    Talent Retention
    Team
    Teamwork
    Tech In HR
    The Jungle Book
    Training
    Trust
    Unfair Dismissal
    Vacation
    Whistleblower
    Work Arrangements
    Working Parents
    Workplace
    Workplace Bullying
    Workplace BYOD Policy
    Workplace Conflict
    Workplace Discrimination
    Workplace Harassment
    Workplace Health
    Work Related Stress
    Zero Hour Contract

    RSS Feed

HR Department, 49 Hollybank Avenue, Lower Ranelagh, Dublin 6, Ireland.
 
Phone : +353 87 852 7723
E-mail: [email protected]

Registered in Ireland under company number 348834

Testimonials

Fallon and Byrne

“As a medium –sized business, we could not justify having an in-house HR person. The HR department provided the perfect solution for us, giving us access to all of the expert advice we needed on an outsourced basis"

READ MORE!
Website by Chevron Studio